Archives quotidiennes :

Organizing Life: A Sociological Study on the Action of Organizing from the Activity of “Personal Organizers”

Victor Pimentel Ferreira (2024)

New Sociological Perspectives, 4(1). Open access, pp. 30-44

Abstract. This paper is dedicated to the mapping and analysis of the values and devices commonly mobilized around the action of organizing. To this end, I investigate the justifications of personal organizers (POs) and examine the definitions explained in personal organizing manuals/books. Methodologically, the work is divided into three fronts: semi-structured interviews with POs, analysis of manuals on the subject, and participant observation at a Brazilian event in this market. In the theoretical field, I draw on the tools of the sociology of morality and French pragmatic sociology. The results of the research point to the possibility that, at certain times, social actors recognize the existence of conflicts in the relations with different entities in their environment (time, money, objects, people, etc.) and, therefore, manifest an impulse to order social reality, trying to mitigate its unstable and potentially problematic character. In this way, this research contributes, on the one hand, to the complexity of the debate on the regimes of engagement pragmatically mobilized by social actors in the coordination of their daily actions and, on the other hand, to the discussion on how the problem of social order appears not only as an important problem of sociological theory, but also as a practical problem of social actors themselves in their daily lives.

Lien / Link

Rankings and their limits: the role of global university rankings in university mergers in Finland

Mikko Kohvakka & Arto Nevala (2024)

Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 68(1), pp. 22-35.

Abstract. Studies of global university rankings often assume that rankings as Anglo-American policy scripts have an increasing influence resulting in a convergence of policies and practices, or that the ideas of rankings continue to diverge into national types. In this article, we take a middle ground by arguing that when an idea of ranking is grounded in a particular place, it takes on hybrid forms because of individual agency and of national and local contingencies that are found at that place. A key concept is “a frictional translation”, by which we refer to more than one way in which capable actors can interpret and translate the idea of ranking within a given geographical and organizational context. We use university mergers in Finland as an example of the translation process, in which global university rankings are interpreted through nationally and locally specific assemblages of institutional forms that support, resist or hybridize them.

Figure 1. A visual representation of the theoretical framework

Lien / Link