Archives de catégorie : Appel à articles / Call for papers in reviews

Call for papers – Deploying Gender Studies in Political Economy

The Revue de la Régulation wishes to stimulate new thought about gender-related issues in political economy. Contributions can be made in the four areas defined below.

Deadline – 31 August 2018

Coordinators: Cécile Lefèvre, Cerlis, Université Paris Descartes and Ined, cecile.lefevre@parisdescartes.fr ; Thomas Lamarche, Ladyss, Université Paris Diderot thomas.lamarche@univ-paris-diderot.fr

1 – Investigations of new fields of economics through the gender lens

The aim of this thematic issue is to encourage reflective articles on « gender and political economy » devoted to themes that are not usually studied from the angle of gender or by means of an analysis defined in terms of gender: gender and systems of production, gender and enterprise, gender and financial globalization, gender and money, gender and economic crisis, gender and the environment, gender and commonplace notions, etc. Comparative approaches (between countries, periods, currents of thought, etc.) are particularly welcome.

2 – Proposals for new perspectives on fields that have already been the subject of publications many times over:

  • Gender and development economics

  • Gender, conventions, indicators and measures in political economy

  • The history of economic thought as seen through the gender lens

  • Gender, work and family (on this theme, given the substantial volume of studies in applied economics on the inequality between men and women in terms of salaries, employment and the relations between family and work, articles of a more reflective and synthetic nature will be given preference over case studies).

3 – Contributions to developments in political economy and heterodox (notably régulationist) approaches inspired by the notion of gender

In view of the strategic positioning of the Régulation Review, contributions relating to the following questions will be particularly welcomed:

  • Institutional economics, the economics of conventions, régulation theory: what do they have to say about gender studies in economics?

  • Are gender studies heuristic (or not) with regard to the development of political economics?

  • Do gender-related issues constitute an interdisciplinary phenomenon which thus establishes a link between the social sciences (economics, history, geography, sociology and anthropology)?

4 – Last but not least, scrutiny of the examination of the gender positioning of economists and of the attention paid by them to gender studies

There are a number of courses and master degrees devoted to gender issues (more of them in sociology than in economics), but the overall picture remains that of a subject granted only marginal importance in academic syllabi for economists. Furthermore, recent investigations have underlined the difficulties encountered by women economists in establishing themselves in the discipline and in the academic environment.

The question of gender also impacts the choice of themes and the different ways in which techniques and methods are used by economists, depending on whether they are women or men.

[…]

Link to the review

Appel à contribution de la Revue de la régulation : Déployer les études de genre en économie politique ?

Coordonnateurs : Cécile Lefèvre, Cerlis, Université Paris Descartes et Ined, cecile.lefevre@parisdescartes.fr ; Thomas Lamarche, Ladyss, Université Paris Diderot thomas.lamarche@univ-paris-diderot.fr

Déployer les études de genre en économie politique ?

La Revue de la Régulation souhaite stimuler de nouvelles réflexions sur l’apport de la notion de genre en économie politique. Les contributions pourront s’inscrire dans les 4 axes suivants.

1-Investiguer au prisme du genre de nouveaux champs de la discipline économique

Ce numéro thématique a pour ambition de susciter des articles réflexifs sur « genre et économie politique » s‘appuyant sur des thèmes habituellement peu étudiés sous l’angle ou avec un questionnement en termes de genre : genre et système productif, genre et entreprise, genre et mondialisation financière, genre et monnaie, genre et crise économique, genre et environnement, genre et communs, etc. Les approches comparatives (entre pays, périodes, courants de pensée, etc.) sont particulièrement bienvenues.

2- Proposer de nouveaux regards sur des champs ayant déjà et souvent donné lieu à publications

  • Genre et économie du développement
  • Genre, conventions, indicateurs, mesures en économie politique
  • Histoire de la pensée économique au prisme du genre
  • Genre, travail et famille (sur ce thème, devant le grand nombre de travaux d’économie appliquée sur les inégalités hommes/femmes du point de vue salarial, de l’emploi et des relations entre famille et travail, des articles plus réflexifs et de synthèse seront privilégiés aux études de cas)

3-Contribuer aux développements de l’économie politique et des approches hétérodoxes, en particulier régulationnistes, à partir de la notion de genre

Compte tenu du positionnement de la Revue de la Régulation, sont particulièrement attendues des contributions sur les questions suivantes :

  • Économie des institutions, économie des conventions, théorie de la régulation : qu’ont-elles à dire sur les études de genre en économie ?
  • Les études de genre sont-elles heuristiques (ou non) pour le développement de l’économie politique ?
  • Les questions de genre fondent-elles un pont interdisciplinaire, un lien entre les sciences sociales (économie, histoire, géographie, sociologie, anthropologie) ?

4-Last but not least, étudier la fabrique (genrée) des économistes et de leur attention (ou non) aux études de genre

On dénombre quelques cours et masters consacrés aux questions de genre (davantage en sociologie qu’en économie), mais le constat global reste celui d’une place marginale accordée à ce thème dans la formation des économistes. Par ailleurs des enquêtes récentes ont souligné les difficultés pour les femmes économistes à acquérir toute leur place dans la discipline et l’espace académique.
La question de genre se pose aussi en termes de choix des thèmes, de mobilisation des techniques et méthodes de manière différenciée selon que les économistes sont des femmes ou hommes économistes.

Appel complet en ligne

 

Appel à articles pour la revue Socio-Economie du Travail

La revue Socio-Economie du Travail a pris depuis 2016 le relais de la série Socio-économie du Travail (AB) de la revue Économies et Sociétés. Elle est désormais éditée en version papier et en version numérique par les éditions Classiques Garnier. Elle conserve le même projet éditorial, le même comité de rédaction et le même fonctionnement que la série Socio-économie du travail de Economies et Sociétés qui est classée à la fois dans la liste de revues HCERES Economie-Gestion et dans la liste du CoNRS de la section 37.

La revue Socio-Economie du Travail a pour objectif de contribuer aux renouvellements conceptuels et aux débats d’idées qui animent aujourd’hui son champ scientifique.

Ce champ est celui du Travail, au sens large du terme, incluant l’Emploi et le Salaire, posture économique traditionnelle, mais également les conditions d’exercice de l’activité de travail et les Relations Professionnelles. Socio-économie du travail propose d’alimenter ces débats par un dialogue interdisciplinaire dans la tradition anglo-saxonne des Industrial Relations.

La revue est ouverte aux approches institutionnalistes, aux travaux qui favorisent le dialogue entre débats théoriques et travaux empiriques qui caractérisent la démarche d’économie appliquée. C’est dans leur capacité à dialoguer avec les différentes approches théoriques de la socio-économie du travail que les travaux empiriques qu’ils soient composés d’exploitation d’enquêtes de terrain ou de traitements statistiques ou économétriques seront appréciés.

La revue est ouverte à toute soumission spontanée en cohérence avec cette ligne éditoriale. Elle propose également régulièrement des appels à contributions qui pourront donner lieu à des dossiers ou numéros spéciaux sur des thématiques ou problématiques que le comité de rédaction souhaite encourager. Si le français est la langue de référence, la revue peut publier des contributions en anglais lorsque les auteurs ne sont pas francophones.

Les soumissions se font désormais en ligne: https://www.classiques-garnier.com/ojs/index.php/set/index

Site internet : http://socioecotravail.hypotheses.org/

Call for papers for Organization Studies

Calls for Papers for forthcoming Special Issues of Organization Studies.

To view further details, including article guidelines and instructions on how to submit, please click on the titles.

The Hidden Life of Categories: Emergence, Maintenance and Change in Organizations, Markets and Society
Deadline for submissions: 30th September 2017

Food Organizing Matters: Paradoxes, Problems and Potentialities
Date for submissions: between 15 and 31 October 2017

Organizational control and surveillance of new work practices
Deadline for submissions: 29th June 2018

Appel à articles/Call for papers “Pluralist Thinking in Economic and Socioeconomic Education” JSSE

The Journal of Social Science Education will publish a special issue in September 2018 on the theme of “Pluralist Thinking in Economic and Socioeconomic Education”. The issue will edited by Reinhold Hedtke, Bielefeld University, Germany.

http://www.jsse.org/index.php/jsse/announcement/view/23

For more than ten years, pluralism in economics and in the education of economists has been a hot issue. Contemporary criticism of conventional economics education has started around the turn of the millennium with student initiatives for pluralist economics like the post-autistic economics movement – with a stronghold in France (autisme-économie) – and gained momentum after the financial crisis of 2007/2008. Students turned against the perceived one-sidedness of syllabi, textbooks and exams of their universities and against economists and economics’ lack of contact with reality. In consequence, economic plurality and pluralism in economic(s) education was put onto the public agenda, initiated controversies and triggered changes in policies of higher education.
Recent student movements, however, are not the first and only stage for the debate on pluralism in economics and economic plurality. On the contrary, methodological, paradigmatic and theoretical pluralism in economic research has triggered a controversial scholarly debate. It involves key questions of teaching economics and business studies in the right way, at universities as well as at schools. Moreover, since citizens and voters, pupils and students are confronted with contentious issues concerning economic policies and their pluralist scientific rationales.
However, we do not know much about the impact of these debates on curricula, schools, textbooks, classroom practices and teacher training. Undergraduates, in principle, may be fortunate to find a more pluralist place for studying – as far as there are heterodox professors left – and overcome economics’ orthodoxy by changing the university or, at least, the department. Others may join ongoing protest movements for pluralist economics or educate themselves via pluralist platforms and webs of knowledge. In contrast, pupils and students of secondary and vocational schools as well as trainee teachers normally do not have these options. As a rule, they have to come to terms with the established curricula, content, textbooks and exams.
Against this backdrop, the thematic issue of the JSSE addresses phenomena, findings, problems and educational approaches of economic plurality and pluralism in economic research at different levels and in different contexts of the educational system. The issue will focus on teaching and learning in schools, on teacher education at universities and teacher training colleges and on social representations of economic plurality held by young people.
The thematic issue calls for deeper analyses of the underlying justifications and assumptions, guiding educational conventions and ideologies, corresponding policies, practices and vested interests. It welcomes papers of different formats, such as theoretical and conceptual or empirical papers, policy and curriculum analyses, comparative analyses, process tracing and discourse analyses as well as actor-centred empirical school and classroom research. We also look for qualitative research like ethnography of classroom practice, case studies of pluralist lessons or studies of pluralist teaching cultures.

 We are reluctant to impose a rigid framework but we would be especially interested in knowing how authors respond to one or more of the following questions:

  •      What are the epistemological, philosophical, psychological or sociological foundations of pluralist thinking about economy, economic life and economic policies and how do they relate to economic and socioeconomic education and to social science education?
  •     What are key empirical findings of pluralist teaching and learning in economic and socioeconomic education at schools, universities and teacher training colleges?
  •     How do students cope with the challenge of pluralist economic thinking in the classroom? What impact does pluralist education have?
  •     What do we know about plural economic thinking of young people and plurality in their representations of the economy? How do they cope with plurality and diversity in their every-day life? What are the approaches to mundane economic plurality socio/economic education should prefer?
  •     The social sciences provide an abundant diversity of approaches to the economy and of economic ideas, but learning time is limited. Which approaches and ideas should be selected for secondary or higher education and why?
  •     How can teachers and teacher educators realise pluralist teaching and learning in every-day teaching?
  •     What are the main normative contexts and patterns of legitimisation for economic pluralism or monism of teaching and learning?
  •     What is the relationship of pronounced pluralism in the economic/socioeconomic curriculum and in teacher education to vested interests and socio/economic policies? How is teaching about scientific controversies in schools and universities related to public dispute on the economy and economic policy?

The issue will contain:

  •     An editorial in which key themes are highlighted and articles are briefly summarised;
  •     4-6 articles of between 6-9000 words;
  •     2-4 book reviews (each approximately 4-800 words long) on issues of pluralist economic teaching and learning in schools.

The focus of the special issue will be socio/economic education and subject-matter research related to the social science domain and its core disciplines economics, economic sociology and business studies. The editors will also welcome theoretical and empirical material that allows for consideration of issues using insights from a range of other academic disciplines and areas (e.g. économie des conventions/sociology of conventions, sociology of education, sociology of knowledge; economic psychology; economic anthropology etc.).

The following schedule will be used:

  • First submission by authors to editors: 20 December 2017
  • Response to authors by editors: 30 January 2018
  • Final submission from authors: 15 May 2018
  • Final reviewing and papers ready for layout: 31 July 2018
  • Publication: 15 September 2018

Special issue of the Journal of Social Science Education

There will be a special issue of the Journal of Social Science Education “Educational Governance of Social Science Education and Citizenship in School: Transformations, Conventions, Justifications and Regulations” which will explicitly address conventionalist perspectives/convention theory.

The issue will be edited by Andrea Szukala (University of Münster, http://www.uni-muenster.de/Soziologie/personen/szukala.shtml) and Reinhold Hedtke (Bielefeld University, http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/soz/ag/hedtke/).
http://jsse.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php/jsse/announcement/view/20

“Recent transformations of the political and socio-economic landscape in Europe and in non-European systems have critical impact on the arrangement and on the justification of civic education in and outside schools. Political, cultural and religious radicalisation, political populism, societal polarisation, inequality, globalisation and migration, challenge educational institutions as well as actors’ common conventional practices and understandings. This translates into conflicts about the educational governance of the political at all levels of the educational system. Domain specific educational governance involves a wide range of modes of regulation of citizenry in school, which we understand in a very broad sense.

This volume addresses ideational, justificatory, regulative and cultural dimensions of this transformation at different levels and in different contexts of the educational system with a special focus on schools, teaching and teacher education. It questions the political and administrative mobilisation of school education for purposes of social inclusiveness, democratic involvement and economic conformance. The thematic issue calls for deeper analyses of the underlying justifications and assumptions, guiding educational conventions and ideologies, processes of quality ascription, corresponding policies, practices and vested interests. It welcomes papers of different formats, such as theoretical and conceptual papers, policy and curriculum analyses, comparative historical analyses, process tracing and discourse analyses as well as actor-centred empirical school and classroom research.

We are reluctant to impose a rigid framework but we would be especially interested in knowing how authors respond to one or more of the following questions:

  •     Which theoretical approaches allow an appropriate understanding of the meta-level of educational governance of citizenship including economic citizenship?
  •     What are key empirical findings of current educational governance in the field of citizenship?
  •     What are the main normative contexts and patterns of legitimisation of the recent transformations of citizenship education?
  •     What is the relationship of educational governance of citizenship in schools to economic, political and social interests?
  •     What are the main tendencies and conventions of today’s educational making of the ‘good citizen’ and the ‘good economic citizen’ in a historical and/or comparative perspective?
  •     What can be learnt from comparative case analyses of subsequent educational transformations in these fields?
  •     How can the current moralisation of social science and citizenship education, namely the shifts between religious and civic education in Europe and North America, be analysed and explained?
  •     How are conflicts about the educational governance of citizenship connected with specific outcomes of civic education?

The issue will contain:
An editorial in which key themes are highlighted and articles are briefly summarized;
6 articles of between 6-9000 words;
2-4 book reviews (each approximately 4-800 words long) on issues to do with transformations of educational governance of social science education and citizenship in school.

The focus of the special issue will be education but the editors will welcome theoretical and other material that allows for consideration of issues using insights from a range of academic disciplines and areas (e.g. économie des conventions or sociology of conventions, sociology of education and sociology of knowledge; political science; ethnography of education etc.).”

Important: deadline was prolonged and will now be 31 of May 2017.